Violet Affleck Feeds The Ducks
Nov 7, 2009 by JENNY
The always adorable Violet Affleck was spotted feeding the ducks at a park in Santa Monica on Friday (November 6). After she ran out of duck food, Violet and the nanny made their way over to the swings.
We just saw the adorable daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck - who turns 4 next month - in Boston with mom and little sister Seraphina, 10 months. The Garflecks were in Beantown while Ben worked on his latest flick, The Town.
Photos: Fame
Filed under
.jpg "celebrity guest blogger")
.jpg "Pick your fav twitpic.")
You shouldn't take pictures of kids unless they are with their celebrity parents. This is like saying Violet is the celebrity. She didn't choose this.
Violet is so gorgeous.
I totally agree with Anonymous #1. They should leave her alone.
I came across this very disturbing of Jennifer Garner trying to get a coffee with her daughter. She was NOT happy with the paparazzi's behavior and I don't blame her. I really don't think they need to get that close and we certainly do no need to see pictures of them EVERY single day. Not trying to lecture anyone, just expressing my feelings.
Here is the video:
http://x17video.com/celebrity_video/jennifer_garner/x17_xclusive_jennife...
No Violet did not choose this but her mother did with her constant exposure of her children, you keep putting them in front of the cameras the paparazzi are going to start to think it's ok, there are many pictures of Violet smiling when she see's the paparazzi, the innocence of a child who does not know what is going on, but her mother should know better.
violet is adorable
How is she exposing her kids when she never sold any picture of her daughters to a magazine? Also in this video you clearly see that Violet is annoyed which is why her mother got upset. Imagine if this were YOUR kid. Celebrity or not this is unacceptable. A picture once in a while is fine but this...
Violet is such a smart happy cute kid.
I don't understand how trying to show a child (regardless of parents' status) the normal way that most kids growup can be considered exposing them to the paps. Things caught on camera of this child have been nothing but those things done by non celeb parents on a daily basis ie; being dropped on or picked from school; playing at the park, eating out with and/or orgrocery shopping with parent(s). How does this come under the heading of exposing them to the paparazzi? Is it better to lock them up at home and leave them with the nanny just because paps trail their parents everywhere. This kid's mom should be applauded rather than critized for the job she does in handling a difficult situation without losing her sanity. I swear I would have lost it a long time ago. Not her, she turns a blind eye to the insufferable presence of the uninvited cameras. Inspite of the madness she seems to works to keep what is healthy and important in life and in the best interest of her kids, in prospective.
Hands down to those who never let their kids see the light of day and only allow photo ops when it is profitable to them and for their careers. End of rant :)
It's ridiculous to say quote you keep putting them in front of the cameras the paparazzi are going to start to think it's ok, unquote. She is not with her mother in the above picture, so you think because she's been with her mother previously in public where the paps took the picture, now they are not to be faulted for thinking its OK to snap her whenever she's out? Her mother and father are the famous ones, she is not, leave her alone and let her be a private person which she hasn't given up the rights to be. I agree, if parents decide to do a magazine spread about their child, they are exposing their child in a public way, which I can THEN understand the paps may think the kid is now has a public persona. Therefore with that reasoning, its SMG's & Freddie Prinze's kid and Jennifer Lopez and the Brangelina kids who would be public property NOT Violet Affleck whose parents have done nothing publicity wise with.
Jennifer Garner is NOT exposing her children!
She is trying to lead a very normal life unlike a lot of other celebrities!
Violet is a beautiful child.
All I know is that Jen is doing the best she can to give her girls a normal life. Jen is not taking her daughters to premires or the red carpet so I don't see how Jen is exposing her daughters. She can't lock the girls up. Celebrities can't win. If Jen takes them out then she is "exposing them to the paps". If she is not seen in public with her daughters then she is a bad mother and the nanny is raising her.
What I'm basically saying is that let them live their lives without judgment. Even if Jen wants to expose her daughters is not none of our business.
Until there is a law to protect celebrity children from the paps, then this sort of thing will keep happening.
Post new comment
Comments made by non-registered users will not appear until the staff has approved them. We welcome different opinions, but the following types of comments will be deleted:
If you are a registered user, you have the ability to flag a comment as offensive.