Jennifer Garner & Her Sweet Seraphina

Dec 16, 2011 by CAROLYN ROBERTSON
Jennifer Garner & Her Sweet Seraphina

Seraphina is so cute!

Expectant mom Jennifer Garner shared a cuddle with her youngest daughter as the pretty pair headed out on a Starbucks run in Brentwood, California (December 16). Wearing a warm winter cardigan, the lovely Juno star kept her growing belly under wraps.

She's looked great throughout her pregnancy, but Jen recently joked of her maternity style: "I wish I was one of those cute pregnant girls who wear skinny jeans throughout their pregnancies. But I just gain weight."

While the Garner-Affleck gang is looking forward to the arrival of baby #3, they'll soon have one more reason to celebrate: Sera will be turning 3 years old next month!

Photos: Flynet, Fame

Other Links


 43 Comments

Anonymous said:

Another day, another photo op.
The paps are always there when she gets there, always know exactly where she will be!

Other celebs living in LA manage to escape the paps. But not Jen, her kids have to see them everyday because Jen won't even attempt to go to places w/o paps.

Other celebs in LA manage to go out and live their lives while not running into the paps EVERY.SINGLE. DAY!

Anonymous said:

Another day, another cut-and-paste comment from you. Other people manage to say something original and intelligent. But not you, we have to see your boring comments everyday because you won't even attempt to say something interesting. Other people on this site manage to go out and make comments while not being a hater. EVERY.SINGLE.DAY!

Anonymous said:

don't waste your time responding to this gal, she's obviously got way too much time on her hands....poor thing.

Janna said:

LOL! That was perfect!

Grace said:

Actually no, most people on here don't manage to say something intelligent and interesting about the Jennifer Garner posts. They say the same boring stuff every day as well "Adorable" "too cute for words" "I love this family" "she's so down to earth." I find it interesting that the only repetitive comments you have a problem with are the ones that are the critical ones. It's hypocritical.

Anonymous said:

Grace, although I have a problem with the repetitive, same old negative comments, I have to agree with you that all this "adorable" "I love this family" nonsense is a bit much.

While I'm not a fan of her acting, I think she seems to be a great mom. I don't believe Garner calls the paparazzi and is genuinely going about her business, trying to be as "normal" as she can for her kids under the circumstances. Constant gushing and lame praise get a bit old after a while though.

arabella said:

adorable

Anonymous said:

Do you have any words in your vocabulary? You say the same thing about every celebrity.

AvaElizabeth said:

well.. other celebs are not so a-list like the Gafflecks.

And in other celebs the people are not so interested.

When I see her I everytime see a very hands on mum, you don't see her kids often with nannys. So, taking your kids with you and don't leave them the most time alone with the nanny has the price of a lot of paps.

Anonymous said:

a-list? hahahahahahaahahah NOW THATS FUNNY!

Anonymous said:

ITA. This woman must crave the attention. Otherwise, just stay home! We all know she can afford an expensive espresso machine - just make your latte at home instead of going to Starbucks every day where you know you'll be photographed.

Anonymous said:

OMG ITA too!!! Why doesn't she just lock herself and her kids up in the house all day????? Why can't she be a hermit so I can find something else to complain about?

Rosy said:

Seeing Jen in her glasses really confirms how much Violet looks like her mama, wow! Bet she'll look just like her when she's older.

Anonymous said:

i don't know what to think about the whole thing, it is apparent that she is photographed everyday, but i can't tell if its because she is so hands on and normal that they just know her schedule, or if the attention is invited? I defiantly admire her ability to smile through it, but i wonder why they just don't move out of LA?

Another said:

She must pay the pap's well.

Anonymous said:

And you must not have paid your English tutor well. There is no apostrophe in paps.

AvaElizabeth said:

well, maybe Denise Richards pays and feeds the paps, but I don't think that Jennifer Garner does that.

I think it's her decision where she lives.
And why shouldn't she step out to do things? What shall she do? Lock at home every day? Lock the kids at home?
Of course the paps know her schedule!
Because she everyday from monday till friday brings violet to school and picks her up after school.
Because she takes her children to dance classes.
Because they like to buy groceries at the farmers market at the weekend.

Do you really want to blame her for that stuff?
omg..

Anonymous said:

Yea she should lock her kids up. That would really be a Christmas miracle!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said:

What's this? The dawn of a new day and another set of identical pictures of Jennifer Garner? It cannot be so! :does shocked face:

T-minus 10,9,8,7...until Jessica Alba.

Anonymous said:

Love this family! Seraphina is such a cutie-pie. :)

Sophia said:

Guys, why bother coming to the site if you don't want to see photos of celebrities and their children? Would it actually matter if Jen called the paparazzi on a daily basis so her photo gets taken? That's what this site is about so why are you complaining?

Only Cowards are Anonymous said:

People love Jen bc she doesn't go all glam (except red carpet), like Gwen (that's just Gwen's swag and personality), just to do her everyday task. She dresses like most moms in the US and that is relatable. The paps love her because she is one of America's sweet hearts and her pics are worth money; not necessarily Angelina money but they are worth money. I do not believe for one second she calls the paps and informs them where she will be for a photo op. At one point the pap used to go to Violet's school so they know her usual stomping grounds. I believe Jen would be happy if no paps followed her but she isn't going to stop her life bc they do, she is graceful.

Anonymous said:

If you guys think that she is not staging these photo ops, you are delusional. She is absolutely working with the paps and making money off it. Hey, why not do it if you can. But, seriously. ALL she does is go to Starbucks and we get to see more and more pictures of her looking fat and frumpy with an ugly pony tail and glasses. At least with Selma Blair, who clearly also staged the photo ops, we got to see some killer maternity style. I am tired of seeing this C lister. A list? No way. She has not worked in ages, her movies have flopped and it's been years since Alias.

Aner said:

I don't think I could have said it better myself. Cheers!

Anonymous said:

If you are so tired of seeing her, stop spending so much time commenting on the posts about her. It would take literally five seconds to scroll past the posts about her. It probably took you at least several minutes to compose and post that comment. Why are you so obsessed with her that you waste your time commenting?

JM627 said:

Fat and frumpy? My God, you are the delusional one. The woman is pregnant and I would venture to say that most people think she looks pretty good for a heavily pregnant woman. But no, you go on and lift yourself up by putting someone else down. I realize that for some people, it's the only way to make themselves feel superior.

But someone answer me this: What is wrong with people who say "she has not worked in ages"? How long is "ages" to you? Because I seem to remember her being in Valentines Day just last year. Her "movies have flopped"? Valentines Day grossed over $200M worldwide. That's quite a flop.

Anon said:

Really? Valentines day is your proof that she has a career. A romantic comedy that opened on valentines day no less with a huge star studded cast? It would have been virtually impossible for that movie not to make money. It would have done just as well without her. They didn't even bother to put her in the sequel.

Anonymous said:

Have you read the reviews on the sequel? Talk about rotten tomatoes. Smart move on Jennifer's part to say thanks but no thanks. Next?

Anonymous said:

Did you read the reviews on the first one? I would say just as rotten. I don't think she said no thanks I think they knew they could get anyone to play her part.

Next!

Anonymous said:

I read the reviews on both, but even without reading them neither movie is what I would call my cup of tea. As for Garner, she probably said "once bitten, twice shy" and simply wasn't interested. No one's saying she's Oscar-worthy, but she is indisputedly "in demand" in Hollywood for certain types of movies and is a commercially successful actress.

Anonymous said:

If by in demand you mean her movies have been on a pay-per-view channel I totally agree. Anything other meaning would be stretching it.

Anonymous said:

Neither Selma Blair nor Jennifer Garner stage photo ops. You are the delusional one. Celebrities that want that kind of attention are the ones that tweet photos of their kids every 5 minutes and make a living off of reality shows. Neither one of these moms are like that. I will agree with you that Selma Blair had killer maternity style. That is a fact.

Anonymous said:

Agree with your first sentence and the twitter part too, but WTF does Selma Blair have to do with any of this? There are lots of celebs who aren't attention-seekers and I've found that the higher up they are on the food chain, the less likely they are to use twitter -- e.g. Sandra Bullock, Halle Berry, Nicole Kidman and numerous other a-listers.

Anonymous said:

I was responding to Anonymous December 17th @ 2:29. She made a comment about Selma Blair staging photo ops.

Anonymous said:

Don't you think if she were staging these photo ops, she'd at least try to look better?? Dumba*s.

Anonymous said:

Again, whether she calls the paps or not (doubt it seriously) who really cares, they get on a site called "celebrity baby blog" and if a celebrity (or a Kardashian) has a baby they will get on so why the heck are you complaining?

Anonymous said:

You all are just dang silly. Just skip over the photos and don't comment on them. Yea or nay, the photos with the most comments get more hits which translate into popularity on the site. She is the favorite family of this blog so maybe you should go to another blog that doesn't favor her

Anonymous said:

Let's see. She is calling which pap? Listed under P for pap or S for stalker? Really people. The photographers are professional and they know where to go. Let the woman and family live their life. They shouldn'[t have to hide. Besides where would we spend our time if not looking at pictures taken on these sites. Or is it that you are judgmental because it isn't the celebrity you want to look at?

Anonymous said:

Loved your post. Funny!!! The only point I don't agree with is saying that these weasels are "professionals". There's nothing professional about their behaviour. They are creepy, sleazy stalkers --- end of story. Have you ever seen them in action? They look, sound and act like a pack of monkeys calling out to the celebs and their kids, chasing after them, etc. Ugh.

anon. said:

You are right. I used the wrong word for them.

anon. said:

You are right. I used the wrong word for them.

anon. said:

You are right. I used the wrong word for them.

Anon. said:

Sorry for the repeats. Hate writing from my phone.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human or a spambot.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Comments are held for moderation before being published.
By leaving a comment you agree to the Terms of Service, including
specifically celebritybabyscoop.com's right to delete comments or otherwise
as set forth in Section 8.