Sharon Stone On Miscarriage, Brain Hemorrhage, Losing Custody Battle

Sharon Stone covers the February/March issue of AARP The Magazine and opens up for the first time ever about a decade of personal struggle, from the brain hemorrhage that nearly killed her to coping with a miscarriage and losing a custody battle over her now 11-year-old son Roan with ex-husband Phil Bronstein. Read on about how the single mom to two more sons she adopted in infancy — Laird, 6, and Quinn, 5 — says the hardships have strengthened her.

On her miscarriage and choosing to adopt: “The last time I lost the baby. I went into 36 hours of labor. While we were at the hospital, our adoption attorney called. I thought, ‘This is such a godsend. This is so right,” she says. “I always thought I would adopt. Even when I was young, I used to look up how to adopt.”

On parenting: “I’m loving raising my kid. Quinn is in junior kindergarten, and he’s very exclamatory! Like a little FBI agent, he tells you everything that’s happening, so I call him Agent Quinn. ‘Mom! Toots pooped in the yard!’ ‘Thank you, Agent Quinn.’ And Laird is like a rocket. He came home with his violin from school yesterday and played it all night. He’s a big romancer: When you talk to him on the phone, he’s like, ‘I’m in love with you, Mommy,'” she says. “I’ve made humanitarian causes and my children much more my priority than the Hollywood scene, being liked and getting movie parts.”

On recovering in bed for 8 months after suffering a brain hemorrhage: “I thought I’d never be okay again. But you can get okay—though you have to have fortitude,” she says. “He just didn’t see me, talk to me, look at me,” she says of Bronstein. She now believes “his initial intention with me was probably corrupt. I was suckered. I’m embarrassed to say that.”

On life after losing custody of Roan: “I would go to these [philanthropic] events where I had to get on stage. I would be in the wings, with people looking at me, my head on the floor, praying: ‘God, please help me. I know I have to go out there and raise money. But I’ve lost my child, I’ve lost my health, I’ve lost everything.’ I was just broken.”

Continue reading the interview with Sharon at AARP The Magazine

Filed under: Sharon Stone

Photo credit: AARP

  • fact checker

    Didn’t she lose custoday of Roan, not Quinn?

    • Jenny Schafer

      Thanks, just updated.

  • Anonymous

    Things must be pretty bad if she’s having to pose for AARP magazine.

  • SMH

    She’s always been an odd one for me. Cant really pin point just why though!

  • Anonymous

    Doesn’t she have joint custody of Roan? The way it sounds here is like the ex has him full-time. Strange deal.

    • Anonymous

      He has cusody she gets visitation monthly and in summer I think but he attends school in San Francisco.

  • gottahavefaith

    Someone who talks about their high IQ is always suspect to me. If indeed she is super smart, it says a lot about the problem of high intellect people, as I’ve never heard her say anything even remotely smart-sounding (this article is an exception). She is rabidly pro-abortion, not even once tying together the adoption/abortion connection in her own life. Most women who’ve had miscarriages realize it was an innocent life that they just lost and grieve terribly for it, and rightly so. I wish her the best, as life can be hard for all of us.

    • Anonymous

      The term is “pro-choice” not “pro-abortion.” Pro-choice advocates support just that, choice. Whether it’s the choice to give the baby up for adoption, the choice to abort, or the choice to keep the baby, they support a woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body. It might not even be a choice that they would choose themselves, but they still support it.

      Very few people want more abortion, and to call someone that is false and offensive. In fact, most pro-choice advocates want less abortion, and want to decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies through better sex education and the availability of preventative options like condoms and birth control pills.

      • Anonymous

        Very well said. I believe those who oppose this position use the term (p-a) to make it sound more horrible, so those who are pro-choice look evil to others.

      • Anonymous

        here, here!

      • Anonymous

        The problem with that theory is, it is not only the WOMAN’S body that is involved. The body of the child gets no say in what the female does to their body. And better sex education and birth control availability is a joke. There are more teenage pregnancies now than there were when killing a child was not an “available” choice!

      • Anonymous

        Pro-choice is pro-abortion not matter what politically correct term you want to apply to it. We’re not stupid.

  • Anonymous

    What dopes! Pro-choice IS pro-abortion. It just sounds better to sanitize it. Geeez…

Latest Dish