Gisele Bündchen Shares Only The Backs Of Her Babes

Gisele Bündchen has shared new photos of her children via Instagram. In one Benjamin, 3, is standing with another little boy.

She writes on August 18, “My little Daft Punk Meus pequenos Daft Punk.”

On August 12 she posted a cute snapshot of Vivian, 8 months. The 32-year-old doesn’t write a caption but tweets that they were in Costa Rica.

The next day she told fans, “Good bye Costa Rica thank you for all your beauty. I feel revitalize! Até mais Costa Rica,…”

Bundchen has topped Forbes’ list of highest-paid supermodels for the seventh year in a row. Her earnings of $42 million is due to her partnership with Grendene – the Brazilian footwear company, her contracts with cosmetics companies, Pantene, Oral-B, and Sky HDTV. She’s also the face of H&M.

Filed under: Benjamin Brady,Gisele Bundchen,Instagram,Vivian Brady

Photo credit: Instagram


Post a Comment

  1. Meghan

    Gee, doesn’t Tom have a son named Jack? I’m going to take a wild guess and say the ‘other little boy’ is Jack.

    • Pippa

      Hey Giselle!….. get over yourself. No one wants to see the BACK of your kids’ heads. Literally, every person would prefer to see their faces, not their backs. Why would you just show their backs? Do you somehow feel better about yourself if you’re only pimping out your children from behind? It’s the exact same thing as showing a pic of face.

      What goes through a mom’s mind when she posts a picture of the back of their baby on the Internet. Something like, “I bet everyone wants to see my baby!! But I dont want to seem like I am “exposing” them so I will just show the back of their head and that will satisfy the public and make me look good!” Seriously, why bother? Is your ego so huge that you just cant help yourself but you dont show their face because you want to remain private.?? If you really cared and wanted to remain private, you wouldn’t post pictures at all. But your ego is so HUGE you cant resist.

      Posting a pic of your baby’s back is the most rediculous thing I have ever heard of. It’s all ego. It’s the same thing as posting their face – you are not protecting them and no one wants to see the backs of their heads. Lose-lose sitch. So just stop. Your ego will recover.

  2. Anonymous

    And if it is Jack then they wouldn’t be HER babeS. It would be her babe and her husband’s babe or Bridget’s babe.

  3. olivia

    I think its better for celebs to just share cute family moments like this, rather than the kid smiling and posing for their parents instagram feeds. She also doesn’t do the tabloid thing, kudos.

  4. Heather

    Daft means stupid or foolish. i hope she is just “daft” and doesn’t understand the meaning of the word.

  5. cb

    what is the new thing with showing only backs of the kids. she was never like this with jack or with ben before. now that she has vivian i guess she needs to be more private. or it makes her feel as special as beyonce. which actually means they both look stupid. either show your kids or keep them out of site of paps.

  6. Heather

    So many dumb comments picking apart every little aspect of the photos and relationships. Come on people.

    Sweet pictures.

    • Anonymous

      Some pople are truly unhappy in their own lives, so they must constantly criticize others to make it clear that the other person is lacking too. Once you have peace and happiness in your own life, you’ll see the beauty in other people’s lives and won’t ever feel the need to be hyper-critical.

  7. coral

    Must be Bridget posting again or her family.. Pippa and others. LOL.
    Get over it… she can post whatever pictures she likes.. not necessarily an ego thing.

  8. coco

    Why do people criticize everything lately? Did the summer sun burn your brains?
    From Jessica Alba, to the Royals, to Gisele Bündchen, in these ast posts I saw so many attacks for things that are absolutely nothing bad, I don’t understand why people are so mean.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *